Fire safety bodies call for change

Closing the fire safety competence gap.

The National Security Inspectorate (NSI) has joined forces with BAFE and the Fire Industry Association (FIA) to call on the UK Government to make independent third-party certification mandatory for verifying the competence of fire safety providers. Together, we are also calling for a single, authoritative register of appropriately certificated organisations.

Our joint recommendations are set out in a new report, The Fire Safety Competence Gap, based on independent research commissioned by BAFE and NSI and conducted by Sapio Research among UK decision-makers with responsibility for, or influence over, fire safety procurement.

In short, we want fire safety to have what gas safety has had for years: a single trusted register, like the Gas Safe Register, where anyone can check in seconds that the people doing safety-critical work are competent.

Awareness is up. The ability to act on it hasn’t caught up

Almost a decade after the Grenfell Tower tragedy, awareness of fire safety responsibilities has grown significantly. But the research reveals a clear gap between knowing what you’re responsible for and being able to fulfil those responsibilities in practice.

93%
of decision-makers believe more attention is being paid to fire safety and more action is being taken
83%
believe third-party certification should be the standard route to demonstrating fire risk assessor competence
55%
of Responsible Persons correctly identified checking their fire risk assessor’s competence as a legal obligation – even though 85% claim to be fully aware of their responsibilities
73%
of decision-makers don’t know who their fire safety supplier is certificated by, whether they’re certificated at all, or use an uncertificated supplier

No equivalent of the Gas Safe Register for fire safety

Homeowners can check a gas engineer’s registration in seconds through the Gas Safe Register. Yet those responsible for fire safety in public buildings have no equivalent way of identifying competent providers.

Richard Fogelman

“

Knowing you need a competent provider and knowing how to check they are competent are two different things. Independent third-party certification gives buyers assurance, and a single register would make it easier to find a competent provider and demonstrate that appropriate checks have been made.
— Richard Fogelman, CEO of NSI

Why independent certification and a single register?

Certification by a UKAS-accredited third-party certification body, such as NSI, provides independent assessment against recognised standards, backed by ongoing monitoring. A single, authoritative register would make that assurance far easier to access – reducing the time and effort involved in checking suppliers, and giving a clearer basis for demonstrating that appropriate steps have been taken when appointing them.

Our partners at BAFE and the FIA share that view.

Dr Justin Maltby-Smith

“

Fire safety is becoming an operational priority for many organisations but the ability to identify and verify competent providers is compromised by the lack of a single, authoritative register. Those responsible for fire safety have heeded the lessons of Grenfell and now we are calling on the Government to help them complete the journey.
— Dr Justin Maltby-Smith, Group CEO of BAFE Holdings
Martin Watson

“

Those responsible for protecting people and buildings need a clear and trusted way of knowing that the professionals they appoint have the appropriate knowledge, skills and experience to undertake safety-critical work. Independent verification would strengthen accountability across the industry and, most importantly, help ensure that competent professionals are carrying out work on which people’s safety depends.
— Martin Watson, Interim CEO of the FIA

The Fire Safety Competence Gap report cover

New research

Read the full report

Discover the full findings and recommendations in The Fire Safety Competence Gap, from BAFE, the FIA and NSI.


Download the report